Tech-Journal

Very relevant to the lives of all US citizens and people around the world for that matter is the current definition of the “non-lethal”. Part of the definition involves the concept that such weapons would necessarily result in a less than 25 percent kill factor for those who happened to be exposed to them. He explained the fallacy in this classification by enlightening us to the fact that land mines do not kill over 25% of their victims and would thus fall under the category of non-lethal as the power that be have described it. . He explained that lasers which have the ability permanently blind a person could also fit the definition. He also gave the vivid example of something like “sticky foam” being used on an enemy and that this would usually not kill the person unless it happened that it landed on the victim’s face and caused a slow and painful death by suffocation.
Read more about HAARP at Technology and information

Trackback URI | Comments RSS